<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Image Formats for Exporting Maps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gothos.info/2008/06/image-formats-for-exporting-maps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gothos.info/2008/06/image-formats-for-exporting-maps/</link>
	<description>A Geospatial Librarian's World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:09:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lucideer</title>
		<link>http://gothos.info/2008/06/image-formats-for-exporting-maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>lucideer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 09:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothos.info/2008/06/11/image-formats-for-exporting-maps/#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>Hey Frank, I came to your site from a google search about svg in web development (an interest of mine) and happily found an entire site on cartography (another interest - though something I admittedly know considerable less about).

Anyway, though this article is now almost a year old, and I&#039;m not usually one to be overly pedantic, I thought I may as well comment. Where you say &quot;you can embed them into html using an object or embed tag (can’t use the standard img tag)&quot; - this is not entirely accurate. I see you&#039;re a Firefox user (from your handy little icon on the right) which is probably the source of the misconception. It&#039;s a popular browser, so many people believe &quot;if Firefox can&#039;t do it it can&#039;t be done&quot;. However relatively speaking Firefox&#039;s support of web standards is quite poor, it&#039;s support of SVG in particular, and all good browsers will support the standard img tag. This Firefox bug is due to be fixed soon too apparently.

As for using Wikipedia&#039;s rsvg solution server-side for IE, that is only used in Wikipedia as it is a large site with millions of users uploading millions of SVGs, so the operation must be done &quot;on-the-fly&quot;. If you&#039;re handling all the SVGs yourself personally, you can rasterise them manually on your computer at home before sending it up to the server. No need for complicated server-side nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Frank, I came to your site from a google search about svg in web development (an interest of mine) and happily found an entire site on cartography (another interest &#8211; though something I admittedly know considerable less about).</p>
<p>Anyway, though this article is now almost a year old, and I&#8217;m not usually one to be overly pedantic, I thought I may as well comment. Where you say &#8220;you can embed them into html using an object or embed tag (can’t use the standard img tag)&#8221; &#8211; this is not entirely accurate. I see you&#8217;re a Firefox user (from your handy little icon on the right) which is probably the source of the misconception. It&#8217;s a popular browser, so many people believe &#8220;if Firefox can&#8217;t do it it can&#8217;t be done&#8221;. However relatively speaking Firefox&#8217;s support of web standards is quite poor, it&#8217;s support of SVG in particular, and all good browsers will support the standard img tag. This Firefox bug is due to be fixed soon too apparently.</p>
<p>As for using Wikipedia&#8217;s rsvg solution server-side for IE, that is only used in Wikipedia as it is a large site with millions of users uploading millions of SVGs, so the operation must be done &#8220;on-the-fly&#8221;. If you&#8217;re handling all the SVGs yourself personally, you can rasterise them manually on your computer at home before sending it up to the server. No need for complicated server-side nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
